SYNOPSIS
In the near future, rich sick-fucks (are they any other kind?) can be teleported at a moments notice to the monthly (high-price) 'APEX' hunting experience (located on a mysterious uncharted island) The 'prey' are selected for their violent tendencies and general alround bad-assery. One seasoned (seen-it-all, killed-it-all) hunter, Samuel Rainsford (Neal McDonough) is becoming jaded with the (all-too-easy) hunts (and despite his billionaire status, is clearly a few cans short of a six-pack, himself)
The 'Apex' corporation save the best til last....in the (listless) form of ex-cop, turned violent criminal and (Quote) "Fucking Degenerate", Thomas Malone (Bruce Willis) who has been kept in a (quote) "Sensory-Deprivation-Cell" (due to his crazy, psychotic temprament) Rainsford is joined on the hunt by a handful of former comrades (some with axes to grind with each other)
If Malone can survive the 12 hour manhunt, he'll be pardoned and given a shit-ton of money for the grandchildren he's only just found out exist.
Let the hunt begin.....
REVIEW
This is Bruce (Paypal-Verified) Willis' FIFTH release of 2021, and with two more 'movies'* in the can (or more likely on 'videotape) this is surely a an actors* yearly output world record (eclipsing Steven Seagals six movie run in 2016) So before I outright rag on the artist-formely-known-as-John-McClane, I sort of admire his work ethic in 2021 (especially in the kung-flu times we're in) I say "Sort-Of" because despite the quantity of projects, Willis' decade-long 'work-ethic' largely consists of doing as little as possible on set (for a day or two) whilst other (less expensive) actors do all the physical stuff......Needless to say, it's business as usual (with a semmingly lower budget than usual)
Thankfuly, the budget wisely opts to keep FX simple (with only a few futuristic 'trappings' on display here) What limited work there is, is typically low-rent (largely inexcusable in 2021) generic landscapes mixed with some extremely ropey opticals near the end. Joking aside, it does literally seem as if the entire budget went on getting Willis (whose one-time command of a million dollars a day, are surely well and truly behind him at this stage?) so only God knows what the actual budget was?
But given my perverse love of bad movies (featuring, used, washed-up, degraded, semi-abused, possibly-suicidal actors) I can forgive a low budget or shoddy FX, as long as they bring 'something' to the movie (even if they're merely content to inhale the stale-farts of former glories) However, Willis brings absolutely NOTHING here, other than winning the 'Most Imobile Performance' since Christopher Reeve in 'Rear Window' (1998) Of course, the biggest question here is, how can Willis play the lead in an action movie and still manage his customary fifteen minutes of inactive screen time....The answer (as per usual) lies in the supporting cast.
Thankfuly, the ever dependable Neal McDonough is on hand, to pick up the slack that Willis' is clearly incapable of nowadays. It's sad to see McDonough clearly thinking he's in a better movie than he actually is (and his performance seems out of place amongst the surrounding dreck) Yes, it's the billionth 'Most Dangerous Game' knock-off (since 1932) and despite McDonough's soliloquies lamenting the complexities between of hunter & prey......the script* still saddles his character with both terrible errors of judgementand contridictory arcs.
But as an actor...He tries (and doesn't shame the movie as much as it shames him)
Lochlyn Munro (no stranger to DTV land) puts in another likable performance (and has a pretty tense 'Bluff-Calling' sequence with McDonough early on in the hunt) Sadly his character is taken out of the movie all too soon. The scripwriters*get round Willis' commitment-coma by having the fellow hunters 'off' each other, whilst a largely inactive Willis looks on at said carnage from nearby bushes and shrubbery (and despite his bright red jacket, most times right in front of the myopic hunters noses) The kiils (apart from a nasty 'skull in head' moment) aren't particulary graphic or memorable.
In fact, there's a sequence around the half-way mark, featuring Willis sauntering through the woodlands (without a care in the world) replete with twee soundtrack (think John Barry's 'Florida Fantasy' from Midnight Cowboy) If the former 'Last Boy Scout' looked any more relaxed, I'd be tempted to wager that this movie was entirely constructed around one of his vacation videos? And because of Willis' bald, frail-looking visage, he's a lot easier to 'body-double' nowadays and is done so, frequently in the final 10-15 minures (in sequence featuring said 'body-double' offing a dozen, hastily-added teleported hunters)
To add further insult to injury, almost every character throughout this movie points out that Willis' character is old, senile and past it (take a fucking hint Bruce?) Which would be fine if Willis didn't prove them right in every scene he's in. The one (half-assed) attempt to big-up Willis, is a female AI hologram stating (Quote) "Pardon my French, but the man is a motherfucker" (which, when bereft of attributive adjectives such as 'Mean' or 'Bad', merely imply that Malone has a penchant for 'Incest') and hardly the iconic HAL 9000 quote that the scriptwriters envisioned it to be?)
To wrap up this review (and trust me, I've given more attention to it, than the scriptwriters* did) 'APEX' highlights little but the continuous downfall of( the once mighty) Bruce (Google-Pay) Willis. It would seem that even Emmet/Furla (EFO) and/or Lionsgate aren't interested, this time around (even if the prerequisite overhead 'Drone-Shots' continue) At 66 years of age, I wasn't expecting Willis to be remaking 'Surviving The Game' (despite releasing a movie entitled 'SURVIVE THE GAME' a mere thirty days earlier) But for both Bruce (and the film-makers) to be so lackadaisical, in a movie (and genre) that should be anything but....is frankly, inexcusable.
It's one thing to phone-in a performance.....But Willis seems to be making collect-calls?
* = Alleged
